Bookmark this site!

  Mobile Chicken House
-Mobile Chicken House
-Construction
-Innovation
-Trading Results
-Approvals

  Standards & Legislation
-The Lion Standard
-The Inland Revenue
-DEFRA
  Press Archives
-Western Morning News
-Farmers Weekly
-North Devon Journal

  More...
-Links
-Contact Us
-Sitemap
 
Request More Information
  Freedom Farm Mobiles
East Moortown
Chawleigh
Chulmleigh
Devon
Tel: 01769 580629
 
Ken Ford:07967 041034
sales@freedomfarm.co.uk
 

 

  What The Inland Revenue Say.......
The Inland Revenue has strict guidance on poultry farming so we enquired as to the availability of any allowances for our endeavours.

The Following show our letter to the inland revenue and their response to us.

 

            Office/JCW/CB            4k” April 2002

 

HM Inspector of Taxes

 
Barnstaple 1
Regent House
Hardaway Head
Barnstaple
Devon

 

Dear Sir

 

MOBILE POULTRY ARCS

We have a client who wishes to construct and market mobile poultry arcs, and we would be very grateful if you would confirm that they qualify for capital allowances under the category of plant and machinery. 

The arc is approximately 14m wide, 24m long, and 3.5m high at its apex. It is constructed upon five skids, which enable it to be moved around. The idea of this is low maintenance — all poultry waste falls through to the floor and is collected when the arc moves. It is solar/wind powered, and has a special lighting and ventilation, moving feed and egg collection facilities.

Our client is looking to market these arcs very soon, and we would therefore appreciate your comments as soon as possible.

 

Yours faithfully

DAVISONS

 

Below is a copy letter returned to us and a copy of the document confirming capital allowances from the Inland Revenue for any of our Mobile Poultry Houses.

Date: 12 April 2002

Our Ref: 58/Technical/GB

Your Ref: Office/JCW/CB

 

Dear Sirs

MOBILE POULTRY ARCS



Thank you for your letter of 4 April 2002.

I am attaching a copy of my instructions, reference CA22 110. This includes guidance on poultry houses.

You will see that whilst most poultry houses do not qualify for Capital Allowances, those that are moveable and intended to be moved in the course of the trade do qualify.

The information supplied by you is that the structures that your client intends to market are both moveable and intended to be moved. Providing therefore that the facts remain as stated by you, then they will qualify for Capital Allowances.

 

MISS G BLAKE

H M Inspector of Taxes

 

 

 

    CA22110 - Plant and machinery allowances: Shelters, huts etc

Underline

Advertisers sometimes lease shelters which they have erected and which they use to display advertisements to bus companies or local authorities. If they do that you should accept that the shelters are plant or machinery but note that where the assets are fixtures the claimant must have an interest in the relevant land CA26100.

Prefabricated buildings are not plant even if they can be taken down and re-erected somewhere else (St. John's (Mountford and another) v Ward, 49TC524). In the St John's School case the school claimed plant or machinery allowances on a prefabricated gymnasium and laboratory. The capital allowance claim was rejected. All that the gymnasium and laboratory did was provide housing in which the school's activities could be carried on. They were not apparatus with which the school's activities were carried on. The buildings contained plant but that was not enough to make the buildings themselves plant.

Most poultry houses / chicken shacks are buildings or structures and so are excluded from plant or machinery allowances CA22010. They are not plant even if they are used in intensive poultry production and contain automated systems for ventilation, heating, food and water.

There was an Irish case, O'Srianian v Lakeview (1984, 3 ITR 219), in which the Irish Courts held that the Irish tax commissioners had not erred in law when deciding that a deep-pit poultry house was a single-entity of plant. However, decisions in the Irish Courts are not binding in the UK, and it is perhaps unlikely that the UK Courts would follow that decision. Gibson L.J in the Court of Appeal in the later case of Attwood v Anduff car wash, 69 TC 575, commented on the decision in O'Srianian v Lakeview , saying "For my part, I have considerable doubt whether the premises test was properly satisfied in that case".

Similarly, the fixed chicken cages inside a poultry house should not be accepted as plant.

Refuse a claim for PMAs on a chicken shack / poultry house unless it is moveable and intended to be moved in the course of the trade. Mobility alone is not enough.

Treat temporary huts which are moved from one site to another and used by builders and contractors to provide canteen and toilet facilities or as storage sheds as site plant. They will then qualify for plant or machinery allowances.

Do not give plant or machinery allowances on shop fronts. They are not plant or machinery. There is guidance at IM993 about the treatment of shop fronts.

Treat show cases associated with a shop front which are distinct from the structure as fixtures and fittings CA21200.

 

  More Services []
Resources Reference Sites Contact Us
· Links
· Sitemap
· Here's What our Customers Say

· Request More Information

Copyright ©2005 Freedom Farm Mobiles Ltd. All rights reserved.