|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East Moortown
Chawleigh
Chulmleigh
Devon
Tel: 01769 580629
Ken Ford:07967 041034
sales@freedomfarm.co.uk
|
|
|

|
|
|
What The Inland Revenue Say....... |
|
The Inland Revenue has strict guidance
on poultry farming so we enquired as to the availability of any
allowances for our endeavours.
The Following show our
letter to the inland revenue and their response to us.
Office/JCW/CB
4k” April 2002
|
|
|
|
HM
Inspector of Taxes |
|
|
Barnstaple 1 |
|
Regent House |
|
Hardaway Head |
|
Barnstaple |
|
Devon |
|
Dear Sir
MOBILE
POULTRY ARCS
We have a client who wishes to construct
and market mobile poultry arcs, and we would be very grateful
if you would confirm that they qualify for capital
allowances under the category of plant and machinery.
The arc is approximately 14m wide, 24m
long, and 3.5m high at its apex. It is constructed upon five
skids, which enable it to be moved around. The idea of this is
low maintenance — all poultry waste falls through to the floor
and is collected when the arc moves. It is solar/wind powered,
and has a special lighting and ventilation, moving feed and
egg collection facilities.
Our client is looking to market these arcs
very soon, and we would therefore appreciate your comments as
soon as possible.
Yours faithfully
DAVISONS
|
|
Below is a copy letter
returned to us and a copy of the document confirming capital
allowances from the Inland Revenue for any of our Mobile Poultry
Houses.
|
Date: 12 April 2002
Our Ref: 58/Technical/GB
Your Ref: Office/JCW/CB
Dear Sirs
MOBILE POULTRY ARCS
Thank you for your letter of 4 April 2002.
I am attaching a copy of my instructions,
reference CA22 110. This includes guidance on poultry houses.
You will see that whilst most poultry houses do not qualify for
Capital Allowances, those that are moveable and intended to be
moved in the course of the trade do qualify.
The information supplied by you is that the structures that your
client intends to market are both moveable and intended to be
moved. Providing therefore that the facts remain as stated by you,
then they will qualify for Capital Allowances.
MISS G BLAKE
H M Inspector of Taxes |
| |
| CA22110 - Plant and
machinery allowances: Shelters, huts etc

Advertisers sometimes lease shelters which they
have erected and which they use to display advertisements to bus
companies or local authorities. If they do that you should accept
that the shelters are plant or machinery but note that where the
assets are fixtures the claimant must have an interest in the
relevant land
CA26100.
Prefabricated buildings are not plant even if they can be taken
down and re-erected somewhere else (St. John's (Mountford and
another) v Ward, 49TC524). In the St John's School case the school
claimed plant or machinery allowances on a prefabricated gymnasium
and laboratory. The capital allowance claim was rejected. All that
the gymnasium and laboratory did was provide housing in which the
school's activities could be carried on. They were not apparatus
with which the school's activities were carried on. The buildings
contained plant but that was not enough to make the buildings
themselves plant.
Most poultry houses / chicken shacks are buildings or structures
and so are excluded from plant or machinery allowances
CA22010. They are not plant even if they are used in intensive
poultry production and contain automated systems for ventilation,
heating, food and water.
There was an Irish case, O'Srianian v Lakeview (1984, 3 ITR 219),
in which the Irish Courts held that the Irish tax commissioners
had not erred in law when deciding that a deep-pit poultry house
was a single-entity of plant. However, decisions in the Irish
Courts are not binding in the UK, and it is perhaps unlikely that
the UK Courts would follow that decision. Gibson L.J in the Court
of Appeal in the later case of Attwood v Anduff car wash, 69 TC
575, commented on the decision in O'Srianian v Lakeview , saying
"For my part, I have considerable doubt whether the premises test
was properly satisfied in that case".
Similarly, the fixed chicken cages inside a poultry house should
not be accepted as plant.
Refuse a claim for PMAs on a chicken shack / poultry house unless
it is moveable and intended to be moved in the course of the
trade. Mobility alone is not enough.
Treat temporary huts which are moved from one site to another and
used by builders and contractors to provide canteen and toilet
facilities or as storage sheds as site plant. They will then
qualify for plant or machinery allowances.
Do not give plant or machinery allowances on shop fronts. They are
not plant or machinery. There is guidance at IM993 about the
treatment of shop fronts.
Treat show cases associated with a shop front which are distinct
from the structure as fixtures and fittings
CA21200. |
|
|